Imagine the plight of young women in America who experience real reproductive healthcare problems (not the wordplay the left uses to euphemize “abortion”). Imagine being offered only unregulated science and 99% failure for years and years of problems, all for infertile couples to finally hear the answer that it’s “impossible.” This is what the world of in vitro fertilization (IVF) looks like – a grueling expensive process with no guarantee of success. It often brings stories of failed embryo transfers and hopeless feelings. But here’s the real: IVF is a multi-billion-dollar industry that thrives on bypassing problems and bypassing moral or regulatory oversight, and besides that nearly half of IVF patients never get answers, being told their infertility is simply “unexplained.”
Enter the field of RRM – or “restorative reproductive medicine,” a new field that is focusing on both medical- and patient-centered concerns. RRM is emerging as a game-changer that seeks to address the root causes of infertility, unlike the morally questionable IVF industry’s band-aid approach. RRM studies show that over 99% of IVF’s “unexplained” cases have identifiable causes. Endometriosis is one that affects millions of women, yet it takes 7-10 years for a diagnosis under current “standard care.”
Big Medical’s establishment groups like the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists dismiss RRM as “nonmedical,” but that’s nonsense. The emerging field of RRM is digging deep, seeking to treat conditions that bureaucrat- and red tape-driven care providers often ignore. For many young couples seeking answers to infertility problems, RRM doctors are diagnosing and treating what IVF specialists often say is impossible to fix. IVF science cowboys would rather attempt their own hand at concocting life in a test tube, evading regulatory and moral boundaries in the process.
“Restorative reproductive medicine” is getting all these results by looking beyond just pregnancy to overall health, a very MAHA principle. They even manage to do it all for often multiple thousands of dollars less than IVF, with 20-30% higher live birth rates.
Time to reject the failed IVF status quo and explore a moral approach that makes American Pro-Life Again.
Despite the disregard for life from many in the medical community, most Americans value human life. At PhyllisSchlafly.com, we’ll arm you with the facts you need to defend life. Join the battle at PhyllisSchlafly.com. Thanks for listening and join us next time for the Phyllis Schlafly Report.
This post originally appeared at https://phyllisschlafly.com/family/restorative-reproductive-medicine-vs-ivf/
Phyllis Schlafly